Using x resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 the last being done in 4K resolution if possible , and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming.
Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:. Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. When operating at full capacity, the Radeon HD consumes Watts of electricity. During idle conditions, consumption drops to Typical power consumption amongst similar GPU competitors ranges between — Watts at full capacity and The lower power consumption of the Radeon HD corresponds to less heat and a longer operating time.
It also offers the following features:. Skip to main content. Game benchmarks Let's see how good Radeon HD is for gaming. Relative perfomance Overall Radeon HD performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.
AMD Radeon Sky AMD Radeon R9 GeForce GTX Radeon Sky Radeon HD XT. Radeon R9 User rating Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself. Questions and comments Here you can ask a question about Radeon HD , agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Report an error Highlighted fragment with error:. Indicate exactly what the error is, if it is not obvious:. Submit Cancel. Your FPS data has been sent. And the other two factory-overclocked submissions are both hotter and louder.
Finally, AMD's reference design demonstrated the worst performance, the least-attractive acoustic profile, and the highest temperatures. Its only redeeming quality is price. Unless you have an application where the 's compute potential is absolutely imperative, you'll probably want to hold off until these cards become a little more affordable which they're already in the process of doing.
Not only does it cool well, but it outperforms the thermal solutions of the other cards we tested. It also manages to beat them in the gaming benchmarks without generating that much extra noise. Although this board won our recommendation in Europe, we're not able to give it an endorsement in the U. As we've seen HIS do in the past, it's only selling this higher-clocked Turbo model overseas.
Sure, it's more attractive than AMD's reference design. But it's certainly not a front-runner at that lower speed. If you don't mind losing three expansion slots to a single graphics card, and are alright tracking down a bracket to keep this heavy board in place, then Asus' HD DirectCU II does wonders to the baseline acoustic performance of AMD's reference Radeon HD
0コメント